However if you did try and relate it to this discussion I think their current business model is actually much more compatible with going open source than the old one. One, it’s not news or part of the linked article, two it’s not particularly related to the Linux release, three it affects all platforms. (As for 1Password abandoning one time sales for subscriptions, to me this is a separate issue. This is very different from asking for a native UI or to use a core OS API, etc.Īgain, it’s fine to ask for a radical business change or require it but the frequency of this as a demand does help explain why few companies go down this path. It’s a demand that the maker of the software alter the core of their business model. The Linux priorities I outlined are fundamentally different.
AgileBits should have no-ones good will, and even as a 1Password user, I support anyone who uses this forum to discuss their move to alternatives. This is a closed-source security facing application from a company that has raised at-least $200,000,000, which at one time charged a large amount of up-front money ($60+) for their product, used dark patterns to drive customers to their subscription-based closed-source cloud product, then left the original users in the dust. It seems likely to me that its a thought process similar to why much of the downtrodden American middle-class sides with Republicans, despite rarely having their best interests in mind. Rather ironic most of the priorities Linux users have are motivated by respecting the user's privacy, security, and freedom. Linux's main difference is that, with so few users, when their priorities are disrespected by Big Corporate, the populace sides with Big Corporate. Write a great iOS app, but no iPad port, or be a couple months late with support for The Notch, people complain. Every platform has its own native UI toolkits and look-and-feel try to release an Electron app, and people complain. Developing for every platform has unique properties.
0 kommentar(er)
